<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 858 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393714</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Single Judge&#039;s order in a Writ Appeal, emphasizing the Assessee&#039;s obligation to respond to a show cause notice and present their case. The Court acknowledged the need to await clarifications from the Kingdom of Thailand and allowed the Assessee to address the authority again based on received clarifications. No interference was found necessary, resulting in the disposal of the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:09:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 858 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393714</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Single Judge&#039;s order in a Writ Appeal, emphasizing the Assessee&#039;s obligation to respond to a show cause notice and present their case. The Court acknowledged the need to await clarifications from the Kingdom of Thailand and allowed the Assessee to address the authority again based on received clarifications. No interference was found necessary, resulting in the disposal of the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>