https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393707 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, incorporating additional grounds that transportation of iron ore did not constitute Goods Transport Agency (GTA) service. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal found that the transportation activities did not fall under GTA service definitions. Consequently, the orders rejecting the refund claims were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, overturning previous decisions and granting relief to the appellant in accordance with the law. en-us Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393707 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, incorporating additional grounds that transportation of iron ore did not constitute Goods Transport Agency (GTA) service. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal found that the transportation activities did not fall under GTA service definitions. Consequently, the orders rejecting the refund claims were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, overturning previous decisions and granting relief to the appellant in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393707