<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 849 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393705</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the reversal of credit before utilization in the case rendered the taking of credit as erased ab initio. As the credit was not utilized to the detriment of the exchequer, the tribunal set aside the orders, negating the liability of interest and penalty on the appellants. The decision was made on 13/03/2020, with both tribunal members concurring in the findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 849 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393705</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the reversal of credit before utilization in the case rendered the taking of credit as erased ab initio. As the credit was not utilized to the detriment of the exchequer, the tribunal set aside the orders, negating the liability of interest and penalty on the appellants. The decision was made on 13/03/2020, with both tribunal members concurring in the findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>