<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (12) TMI 39 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21761</link>
    <description>Interest charged under sections 220(2), 215 and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act was held not to constitute allowable business expenditure under section 37. The point was treated as covered by consistent earlier decisions, and no contrary authority was shown. Accordingly, the deduction claim failed and the question was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 12:51:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (12) TMI 39 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21761</link>
      <description>Interest charged under sections 220(2), 215 and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act was held not to constitute allowable business expenditure under section 37. The point was treated as covered by consistent earlier decisions, and no contrary authority was shown. Accordingly, the deduction claim failed and the question was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>