https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393692 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellants, holding that the disputed goods were used for assembly/manufacture of capital goods within the factory premises, thus making them eligible for CENVAT benefit under Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The Tribunal relied on legal principles and precedents, including the Madras High Court judgment in Thiru Arooran Sugars case, to set aside the impugned orders and grant consequential relief to the appellants as per law. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Mar 2020 10:53:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393692 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellants, holding that the disputed goods were used for assembly/manufacture of capital goods within the factory premises, thus making them eligible for CENVAT benefit under Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The Tribunal relied on legal principles and precedents, including the Madras High Court judgment in Thiru Arooran Sugars case, to set aside the impugned orders and grant consequential relief to the appellants as per law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393692