<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 835 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393691</link>
    <description>Duty, interest and penalty were stated to be unsustainable for a period when factory production had already stopped, because factory records and departmental verification supported the finding of closure and non-manufacture. The delayed intimation to the department was treated as insufficient, by itself, to fasten liability for a period in which no manufacture was taking place. On that basis, the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 10:52:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 835 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393691</link>
      <description>Duty, interest and penalty were stated to be unsustainable for a period when factory production had already stopped, because factory records and departmental verification supported the finding of closure and non-manufacture. The delayed intimation to the department was treated as insufficient, by itself, to fasten liability for a period in which no manufacture was taking place. On that basis, the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>