<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 834 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393690</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the department&#039;s decision to disallow Cenvat credit on items integral to the manufacturing process. It found that the items in question, including welding rods, pipes, electronic regulators, HR sheets, pumps, ropes, joints, structural material, SS welding tubes, and structural supports for batch centrifugal machines, qualified as inputs under Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence from the department to prove that these items were used for support structures or laying foundations, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 10:50:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 834 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393690</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the department&#039;s decision to disallow Cenvat credit on items integral to the manufacturing process. It found that the items in question, including welding rods, pipes, electronic regulators, HR sheets, pumps, ropes, joints, structural material, SS welding tubes, and structural supports for batch centrifugal machines, qualified as inputs under Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence from the department to prove that these items were used for support structures or laying foundations, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>