<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 825 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393681</link>
    <description>Penalty for alleged mismatch between transport documents and goods was not warranted where the Tribunal found that pressure horns were used in tractors and no enquiry or expert opinion was obtained to disprove that description. The High Court noted that no material was produced in revision to show the finding was perverse or contrary to the record, so the factual basis for treating the goods as different was not established. The order setting aside the penalty was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 10:02:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 825 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393681</link>
      <description>Penalty for alleged mismatch between transport documents and goods was not warranted where the Tribunal found that pressure horns were used in tractors and no enquiry or expert opinion was obtained to disprove that description. The High Court noted that no material was produced in revision to show the finding was perverse or contrary to the record, so the factual basis for treating the goods as different was not established. The order setting aside the penalty was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>