https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21758 Landlord locus standi existed to challenge the forfeiture order because the tenancy forfeiture directly affected proprietary interests and the tenant could not create occupation in another's favour without consent. The Competent Authority was also said to lack jurisdiction to forfeit tenancy rights under the Act, as such forfeiture exceeded statutory power and impermissibly prejudiced the landlord. The appeal therefore succeeded only as to the forfeiture order concerning the tenancy premises, while the order relating to the remaining properties was left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 27 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:32:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21758 Landlord locus standi existed to challenge the forfeiture order because the tenancy forfeiture directly affected proprietary interests and the tenant could not create occupation in another's favour without consent. The Competent Authority was also said to lack jurisdiction to forfeit tenancy rights under the Act, as such forfeiture exceeded statutory power and impermissibly prejudiced the landlord. The appeal therefore succeeded only as to the forfeiture order concerning the tenancy premises, while the order relating to the remaining properties was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 27 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21758