<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 817 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393673</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 4-B(5) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was said to be unsustainable where the only basis was alleged excess procurement of diesel without material proving misuse of the recognition certificate. The text notes that the assessee purchased diesel against Form III-B for use in generator sets running plant and machinery for khandsari sugar manufacture, and that the Tribunal inferred diversion merely from the quantity purchased. It states that, absent evidence of private use or use for a non-manufacturing purpose, misuse could not be found on surmise. The penalty order was therefore not sustainable on the existing record and fresh adjudication was required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 09:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 817 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393673</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 4-B(5) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was said to be unsustainable where the only basis was alleged excess procurement of diesel without material proving misuse of the recognition certificate. The text notes that the assessee purchased diesel against Form III-B for use in generator sets running plant and machinery for khandsari sugar manufacture, and that the Tribunal inferred diversion merely from the quantity purchased. It states that, absent evidence of private use or use for a non-manufacturing purpose, misuse could not be found on surmise. The penalty order was therefore not sustainable on the existing record and fresh adjudication was required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>