<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 815 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393671</link>
    <description>A probationary judicial officer may be denied confirmation on a holistic assessment of suitability, including overall performance, integrity, conduct and behaviour, and a court will not lightly interfere with the Full Court&#039;s administrative evaluation under Article 235. The writ court cannot act as an appellate authority or substitute its own view merely because another conclusion is possible on the same material. A simple discharge during probation does not attract Article 311(2) unless it is founded on misconduct or bears a stigma. Here, the order was based on unsuitability and not a proved charge, so the discharge was held simpliciter and valid without a disciplinary enquiry or prior hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 09:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 815 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393671</link>
      <description>A probationary judicial officer may be denied confirmation on a holistic assessment of suitability, including overall performance, integrity, conduct and behaviour, and a court will not lightly interfere with the Full Court&#039;s administrative evaluation under Article 235. The writ court cannot act as an appellate authority or substitute its own view merely because another conclusion is possible on the same material. A simple discharge during probation does not attract Article 311(2) unless it is founded on misconduct or bears a stigma. Here, the order was based on unsuitability and not a proved charge, so the discharge was held simpliciter and valid without a disciplinary enquiry or prior hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>