https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21757 Tenancy rights were treated as a personal right arising from the landlord-tenant relationship, and forfeiture would also affect the landlord's ability to enforce tenancy terms, including eviction where appropriate. Because the landlord was not an affected person under the NDPS Act and was not before the Competent Authority, the Authority had no jurisdiction to direct forfeiture of the appellant's tenancy rights. The forfeiture was therefore held invalid and was set aside. en-us Fri, 27 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21757 Tenancy rights were treated as a personal right arising from the landlord-tenant relationship, and forfeiture would also affect the landlord's ability to enforce tenancy terms, including eviction where appropriate. Because the landlord was not an affected person under the NDPS Act and was not before the Competent Authority, the Authority had no jurisdiction to direct forfeiture of the appellant's tenancy rights. The forfeiture was therefore held invalid and was set aside. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 27 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21757