<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 809 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties imposed under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act. The appellant promptly paid the Service Tax upon notification by the audit party, and there was no evidence of deliberate suppression of facts to evade tax payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 809 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties imposed under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act. The appellant promptly paid the Service Tax upon notification by the audit party, and there was no evidence of deliberate suppression of facts to evade tax payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>