<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 787 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393643</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the penalties imposed by the Addl.CIT under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. It found the transactions genuine, involving closely associated parties, and supported by reasonable cause for repayments made otherwise than by crossed cheques or demand drafts. The tribunal emphasized the evidence provided by the assessee, leading to the cancellation of penalties in both issues regarding loan repayments and deposits to various parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 787 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393643</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the penalties imposed by the Addl.CIT under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. It found the transactions genuine, involving closely associated parties, and supported by reasonable cause for repayments made otherwise than by crossed cheques or demand drafts. The tribunal emphasized the evidence provided by the assessee, leading to the cancellation of penalties in both issues regarding loan repayments and deposits to various parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>