<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 765 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants&#039; refund claims were not time-barred as they were filed within the prescribed period from the final assessment of bills of entry. The matter was remanded for further adjudication on the merits by the adjudicating authority within a specified timeline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:25:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 765 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants&#039; refund claims were not time-barred as they were filed within the prescribed period from the final assessment of bills of entry. The matter was remanded for further adjudication on the merits by the adjudicating authority within a specified timeline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>