<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 753 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393609</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalties imposed but upheld the confirmation of the demand and interest. It was determined that charges for providing goods used in event management should be included in the taxable value for service tax payment, even if separate contracts were utilized. The appellant&#039;s argument that the demand was not subject to service tax due to the absence of registration under a specific category was dismissed, and legal precedents cited were deemed irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 753 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393609</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalties imposed but upheld the confirmation of the demand and interest. It was determined that charges for providing goods used in event management should be included in the taxable value for service tax payment, even if separate contracts were utilized. The appellant&#039;s argument that the demand was not subject to service tax due to the absence of registration under a specific category was dismissed, and legal precedents cited were deemed irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>