https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393603 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by setting aside the rejection of refund claims based on incorrect recipient address in FIRC and the time-barred nature of the claims. The rejection due to non-submission of FIRCs was remanded for reconsideration, and the rejection for payment realization through Forex cheques was also remanded for further verification. The Tribunal directed the refund sanctioning authority to dispose of the matters within three months from the submission of necessary documents by the appellants. en-us Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Mar 2020 11:36:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393603 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by setting aside the rejection of refund claims based on incorrect recipient address in FIRC and the time-barred nature of the claims. The rejection due to non-submission of FIRCs was remanded for reconsideration, and the rejection for payment realization through Forex cheques was also remanded for further verification. The Tribunal directed the refund sanctioning authority to dispose of the matters within three months from the submission of necessary documents by the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393603