https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393589 The court quashed the assessment order and the order of the first appellate authority due to fraudulent activities by the Tax Consultant, who misused the TIN Number for bogus dealings without the petitioner's knowledge. The court also canceled the registration under the GVAT Act, remitting both matters for fresh hearings. The Assessing Officer was directed to re-examine the case considering the fraudulent activities and pass an appropriate order. The Writ Application was disposed of with instructions for reevaluation, granting direct service and allowing the rule to be made absolute to the specified extent. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2020 12:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393589 The court quashed the assessment order and the order of the first appellate authority due to fraudulent activities by the Tax Consultant, who misused the TIN Number for bogus dealings without the petitioner's knowledge. The court also canceled the registration under the GVAT Act, remitting both matters for fresh hearings. The Assessing Officer was directed to re-examine the case considering the fraudulent activities and pass an appropriate order. The Writ Application was disposed of with instructions for reevaluation, granting direct service and allowing the rule to be made absolute to the specified extent. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393589