<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 732 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393588</link>
    <description>An effective statutory appeal under Section 58 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 barred recourse to writ jurisdiction where the grievance was alleged breach of natural justice. The Court stated that the appellate forum could examine both procedural objections and the merits of the assessment on the record, so the existence of an adequate alternate remedy justified relegation to the statutory appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:31:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 732 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393588</link>
      <description>An effective statutory appeal under Section 58 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 barred recourse to writ jurisdiction where the grievance was alleged breach of natural justice. The Court stated that the appellate forum could examine both procedural objections and the merits of the assessment on the record, so the existence of an adequate alternate remedy justified relegation to the statutory appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>