<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1945 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286896</link>
    <description>The Tribunal clarified that the landlord could seek eviction of the Corporate Debtor post-moratorium period, following due process of law. The Adjudicating Authority lacked competency to issue eviction orders. The Tribunal emphasized that determination of the landlord-tenant relationship was outside its jurisdiction. The appeal was disposed of with clarifications, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 09:59:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1945 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286896</link>
      <description>The Tribunal clarified that the landlord could seek eviction of the Corporate Debtor post-moratorium period, following due process of law. The Adjudicating Authority lacked competency to issue eviction orders. The Tribunal emphasized that determination of the landlord-tenant relationship was outside its jurisdiction. The appeal was disposed of with clarifications, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>