<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1564 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286907</link>
    <description>An allowance paid by an employer is exempt under section 10(14)(i) read with rule 2BB(1)(f) only where it is granted to meet actual expenditure on purchase or maintenance of a prescribed uniform worn during performance of duties. On the material available, the employer&#039;s circular regulated only a dress code, not a distinct uniform, and the earlier uniform prescription was not produced. A dress code permitting formal clothing choices is not equivalent to a uniform requiring identifiable design and colours. The allowance therefore did not qualify for exemption, and the employer remained liable to deduct tax at source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 09:59:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1564 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286907</link>
      <description>An allowance paid by an employer is exempt under section 10(14)(i) read with rule 2BB(1)(f) only where it is granted to meet actual expenditure on purchase or maintenance of a prescribed uniform worn during performance of duties. On the material available, the employer&#039;s circular regulated only a dress code, not a distinct uniform, and the earlier uniform prescription was not produced. A dress code permitting formal clothing choices is not equivalent to a uniform requiring identifiable design and colours. The allowance therefore did not qualify for exemption, and the employer remained liable to deduct tax at source.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>