<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1747 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the rectification of mistake application regarding the rate of tax on works contracts, emphasizing that rectification is not meant for revising orders but for correcting patent errors. The appellant&#039;s failure to present crucial legal decisions during the original proceedings precluded rectification, as ongoing works contracts were deemed to attract the higher rate of duty from 1.3.2008. The Tribunal held that the mistake lay with the litigant, not the Bench, and therefore the application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1747 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the rectification of mistake application regarding the rate of tax on works contracts, emphasizing that rectification is not meant for revising orders but for correcting patent errors. The appellant&#039;s failure to present crucial legal decisions during the original proceedings precluded rectification, as ongoing works contracts were deemed to attract the higher rate of duty from 1.3.2008. The Tribunal held that the mistake lay with the litigant, not the Bench, and therefore the application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>