<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1321 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286890</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed Revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT(A)&#039;s order for the assessment year 2004-05. It reversed the decision on the timing of deduction under section 10B but upheld the eligibility of scrap sales and provisions written back for relief under section 10B, in line with High Court rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:48:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1321 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286890</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed Revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT(A)&#039;s order for the assessment year 2004-05. It reversed the decision on the timing of deduction under section 10B but upheld the eligibility of scrap sales and provisions written back for relief under section 10B, in line with High Court rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>