<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 728 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393584</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitions as the petitioners failed to prove technical glitches and attempts to file Form GST Tran-1 within the prescribed period. The validity of Rule 117 was upheld, and the limitation period for claiming transitional credit was deemed applicable. The court rejected arguments on vested rights and upheld the GST Council&#039;s findings, denying relief to the petitioners. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 728 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393584</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitions as the petitioners failed to prove technical glitches and attempts to file Form GST Tran-1 within the prescribed period. The validity of Rule 117 was upheld, and the limitation period for claiming transitional credit was deemed applicable. The court rejected arguments on vested rights and upheld the GST Council&#039;s findings, denying relief to the petitioners. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>