<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 717 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393573</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the initiation of proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2002-03, emphasizing that the notice served is a precondition for assessment order but not to confer jurisdiction. The Tribunal upheld additions for undisclosed purchases and unexplained expenditure due to the assessee&#039;s failure to provide evidence, with the CIT(A) and Tribunal finding no infirmity in the lower authorities&#039; decisions. For the assessment year 2003-04, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, maintaining consistency with the decisions for 2002-03, resulting in the dismissal of both appeals and upholding the additions made by the AO and CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:12:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 717 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393573</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the initiation of proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2002-03, emphasizing that the notice served is a precondition for assessment order but not to confer jurisdiction. The Tribunal upheld additions for undisclosed purchases and unexplained expenditure due to the assessee&#039;s failure to provide evidence, with the CIT(A) and Tribunal finding no infirmity in the lower authorities&#039; decisions. For the assessment year 2003-04, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, maintaining consistency with the decisions for 2002-03, resulting in the dismissal of both appeals and upholding the additions made by the AO and CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>