<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 709 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393565</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to permit the royalty expenditure of Rs. 31,11,900. The Tribunal considered the consistency in the treatment of royalty payments in subsequent years and concluded that the payment for technical assistance should be treated as revenue expenditure, overturning the initial disallowance decision based on enduring benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:47:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 709 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393565</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to permit the royalty expenditure of Rs. 31,11,900. The Tribunal considered the consistency in the treatment of royalty payments in subsequent years and concluded that the payment for technical assistance should be treated as revenue expenditure, overturning the initial disallowance decision based on enduring benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>