<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1691 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286872</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee, directing a fresh hearing before the regular Bench to address unadjudicated issues regarding Fair Market Value computation and 14A disallowance. The Tribunal recalled its previous order due to failure to consider specific case laws and the unadjudicated Ground No.1(c) related to 14A disallowance, emphasizing the need for a reexamination of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:07:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1691 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286872</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee, directing a fresh hearing before the regular Bench to address unadjudicated issues regarding Fair Market Value computation and 14A disallowance. The Tribunal recalled its previous order due to failure to consider specific case laws and the unadjudicated Ground No.1(c) related to 14A disallowance, emphasizing the need for a reexamination of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>