<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1752 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286878</link>
    <description>The Revenue relied on the Delhi HC&#039;s earlier remand order in Ashok Prasad Gupta and submitted that the Tribunal had followed its own prior view in that matter. The Court noted that the earlier order and the subsequent AO/CIT(A) orders should be placed before it on the next date of hearing, since they were relevant to the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on its previous decision. The matter was therefore listed for further hearing on 26.02.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:07:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1752 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286878</link>
      <description>The Revenue relied on the Delhi HC&#039;s earlier remand order in Ashok Prasad Gupta and submitted that the Tribunal had followed its own prior view in that matter. The Court noted that the earlier order and the subsequent AO/CIT(A) orders should be placed before it on the next date of hearing, since they were relevant to the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on its previous decision. The matter was therefore listed for further hearing on 26.02.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>