https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286869 Prior Presidential sanction under Article 304(b) was treated as a mandatory constitutional safeguard for a Bill of the relevant kind, and the proviso was read purposively to prevent circumvention through later amendments or post-Constitution enactment. A narrow construction limiting the sanction requirement only to the date of introduction was rejected because it would allow the constitutional protection to be defeated after the Constitution came into force. The result stated in the text is that the Bill and the resulting enactment were invalid for non-compliance with the prior sanction requirement, and the challenge to the impugned proceedings succeeded. en-us Wed, 10 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:54:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286869 Prior Presidential sanction under Article 304(b) was treated as a mandatory constitutional safeguard for a Bill of the relevant kind, and the proviso was read purposively to prevent circumvention through later amendments or post-Constitution enactment. A narrow construction limiting the sanction requirement only to the date of introduction was rejected because it would allow the constitutional protection to be defeated after the Constitution came into force. The result stated in the text is that the Bill and the resulting enactment were invalid for non-compliance with the prior sanction requirement, and the challenge to the impugned proceedings succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286869