<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (10) TMI 41 - COCHIN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286859</link>
    <description>Article 301 guarantees freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse, while article 304(b) permits State restrictions only subject to prior Presidential sanction for a Bill or amendment introduced for that purpose. The text treats section 3 of the Public Safety Measures Act, 1950 as falling within this constitutional field and notes that no Presidential sanction was obtained. On that basis, section 3 was held unconstitutional, illegal and void. Because the Paddy (Acquisition and Movement) Control Order, 1950 depended entirely on section 3, the Order was also void and the convictions, sentences, forfeiture and fine could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:40:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (10) TMI 41 - COCHIN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286859</link>
      <description>Article 301 guarantees freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse, while article 304(b) permits State restrictions only subject to prior Presidential sanction for a Bill or amendment introduced for that purpose. The text treats section 3 of the Public Safety Measures Act, 1950 as falling within this constitutional field and notes that no Presidential sanction was obtained. On that basis, section 3 was held unconstitutional, illegal and void. Because the Paddy (Acquisition and Movement) Control Order, 1950 depended entirely on section 3, the Order was also void and the convictions, sentences, forfeiture and fine could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>