https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286858 Articles 301 and 304(b) were treated as applying to trade and transport within a State, because the phrase "with or within a State" covers movement between different parts of the same State as well as inter-State trade. The Court also applied the severability test and found Section 3 of the Travancore-Cochin Public Safety Measures Act, 1950 to be a single inseparable scheme, so the valid portion could not survive after the constitutional defect was identified. The provision therefore required presidential sanction and, lacking it, was void in its entirety and unenforceable. en-us Wed, 11 Nov 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:32:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286858 Articles 301 and 304(b) were treated as applying to trade and transport within a State, because the phrase "with or within a State" covers movement between different parts of the same State as well as inter-State trade. The Court also applied the severability test and found Section 3 of the Travancore-Cochin Public Safety Measures Act, 1950 to be a single inseparable scheme, so the valid portion could not survive after the constitutional defect was identified. The provision therefore required presidential sanction and, lacking it, was void in its entirety and unenforceable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Nov 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286858