<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 689 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393545</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a software development company, in a case challenging notices under Sections 148 and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12. The court found that the notice issued to a non-existing entity post-amalgamation was a substantive illegality, not a procedural defect, and therefore not curable under Section 292-B of the Act. As a result, the court quashed the notices and overruled the objections raised by the revenue, allowing the writ petition filed by the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:45:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 689 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393545</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a software development company, in a case challenging notices under Sections 148 and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12. The court found that the notice issued to a non-existing entity post-amalgamation was a substantive illegality, not a procedural defect, and therefore not curable under Section 292-B of the Act. As a result, the court quashed the notices and overruled the objections raised by the revenue, allowing the writ petition filed by the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>