<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 688 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393544</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to reassess the issue based on the cost price of sugar and to make additions only if the concessional price is below the cost price, thus treating it as &#039;appropriation of profit.&#039; The decision underscores the principle that potential profit loss does not equate to profit appropriation unless the sale price is below the cost price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:37:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 688 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393544</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to reassess the issue based on the cost price of sugar and to make additions only if the concessional price is below the cost price, thus treating it as &#039;appropriation of profit.&#039; The decision underscores the principle that potential profit loss does not equate to profit appropriation unless the sale price is below the cost price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>