<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 687 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed all three appeals of the assessee. It ruled in favor of the assessee on the deduction issue under section 36(1)(viia) without rural branches/advances. The disallowances of advertisement expenses under section 37(1) were upheld, and adjustments were made to the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:37:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 687 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed all three appeals of the assessee. It ruled in favor of the assessee on the deduction issue under section 36(1)(viia) without rural branches/advances. The disallowances of advertisement expenses under section 37(1) were upheld, and adjustments were made to the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>