<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 675 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393531</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) by the CIT(A). The decision was based on the prompt rectification of the mistake during assessment proceedings and reliance on professional advice, in line with legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 675 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393531</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) by the CIT(A). The decision was based on the prompt rectification of the mistake during assessment proceedings and reliance on professional advice, in line with legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>