<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 666 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393522</link>
    <description>The petition to quash the order taking cognizance of offenses under various acts, including the Companies Act and Indian Penal Code, was successful. The petitioner, undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, had a resolution plan approved, resulting in new unrelated management taking over. Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code mandates discharge from proceedings upon approval of the resolution plan. As the resolution plan was approved, the petitioner was entitled to discharge, and the impugned order and summons were set aside, with the complaint against the petitioner quashed. Former promoters or officers responsible for offenses related to the petitioner company remain subject to prosecution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 666 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393522</link>
      <description>The petition to quash the order taking cognizance of offenses under various acts, including the Companies Act and Indian Penal Code, was successful. The petitioner, undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, had a resolution plan approved, resulting in new unrelated management taking over. Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code mandates discharge from proceedings upon approval of the resolution plan. As the resolution plan was approved, the petitioner was entitled to discharge, and the impugned order and summons were set aside, with the complaint against the petitioner quashed. Former promoters or officers responsible for offenses related to the petitioner company remain subject to prosecution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>