<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 658 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393514</link>
    <description>The court set aside the communications rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme and directed the respondent to decide the application after providing an opportunity for a hearing. The court emphasized that an opportunity of hearing should have been given before any adverse order was passed. The matter was scheduled for further proceedings, with both parties&#039; rights and contentions left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 658 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393514</link>
      <description>The court set aside the communications rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme and directed the respondent to decide the application after providing an opportunity for a hearing. The court emphasized that an opportunity of hearing should have been given before any adverse order was passed. The matter was scheduled for further proceedings, with both parties&#039; rights and contentions left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>