<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 657 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393513</link>
    <description>The activity was held not to amount to manufacture because the exported goods were a supplied JCB machine with standard accessories, not a customised product made by the applicant. The export order and packing list treated the engine, cold start kit and accessories as separate items, and the alleged fitting or modification at the applicant&#039;s end was not supported. As the transaction was treated as trading in bought-out goods rather than manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, rebate on export was not admissible and the claim for re-credit of debited Cenvat credit was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 657 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393513</link>
      <description>The activity was held not to amount to manufacture because the exported goods were a supplied JCB machine with standard accessories, not a customised product made by the applicant. The export order and packing list treated the engine, cold start kit and accessories as separate items, and the alleged fitting or modification at the applicant&#039;s end was not supported. As the transaction was treated as trading in bought-out goods rather than manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, rebate on export was not admissible and the claim for re-credit of debited Cenvat credit was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>