<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 656 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393512</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for re-examination of the applicability of Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and the maintenance of adequate records for CENVAT Credit. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed review of records and statutory provisions to address discrepancies. The appellant was granted a denovo adjudication to ensure a fair hearing and proper determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:09:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 656 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393512</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for re-examination of the applicability of Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and the maintenance of adequate records for CENVAT Credit. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed review of records and statutory provisions to address discrepancies. The appellant was granted a denovo adjudication to ensure a fair hearing and proper determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>