<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1452 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286847</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appeal of the assessee in a case concerning the classification of services under &#039;Clearing and Forwarding&#039; for service tax liability. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalty was set aside as the Tribunal found that the activities did not meet the essential requirements of &#039;Clearing and Forwarding&#039; services, emphasizing the need for physical handling and forwarding of goods under the principal&#039;s instructions. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting the limited scope of taxable activities under &#039;Clearing and Forwarding&#039; services and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to the non-taxable nature of the services provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:18:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1452 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286847</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appeal of the assessee in a case concerning the classification of services under &#039;Clearing and Forwarding&#039; for service tax liability. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalty was set aside as the Tribunal found that the activities did not meet the essential requirements of &#039;Clearing and Forwarding&#039; services, emphasizing the need for physical handling and forwarding of goods under the principal&#039;s instructions. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting the limited scope of taxable activities under &#039;Clearing and Forwarding&#039; services and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to the non-taxable nature of the services provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>