https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393508 The court found no reason to entertain the writ petition seeking to quash the order forfeiting a bank guarantee and requesting a writ of mandamus. As the petitioner had already appealed before CESTAT, New Delhi, and could file a stay application there, the court directed CESTAT to decide on the stay application in accordance with relevant laws and regulations. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition and the civil miscellaneous application was also closed accordingly. en-us Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:54:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393508 The court found no reason to entertain the writ petition seeking to quash the order forfeiting a bank guarantee and requesting a writ of mandamus. As the petitioner had already appealed before CESTAT, New Delhi, and could file a stay application there, the court directed CESTAT to decide on the stay application in accordance with relevant laws and regulations. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition and the civil miscellaneous application was also closed accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393508