<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 650 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393506</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the order, allowing the confiscated goods to be released on payment of a redemption fine. The penalty under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 was also reduced. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, emphasizing compliance with import restrictions and the rationale behind the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 650 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393506</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the order, allowing the confiscated goods to be released on payment of a redemption fine. The penalty under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 was also reduced. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, emphasizing compliance with import restrictions and the rationale behind the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>