<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 645 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for a merit-based decision, emphasizing the need to address substantive issues rather than focusing solely on the limitation aspect. The High Court&#039;s direction to admit the appeal on a pre-deposit and hear all points was considered, leading to the decision to remand the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on the merits without the limitation issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:34:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 645 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for a merit-based decision, emphasizing the need to address substantive issues rather than focusing solely on the limitation aspect. The High Court&#039;s direction to admit the appeal on a pre-deposit and hear all points was considered, leading to the decision to remand the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on the merits without the limitation issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>