https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393497 Extended-period limitation was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the respondent. The penalty-related issue was addressed consistently with the merits having been decided in favour of the appellant, while the appeal's principal questions were disposed of by following an earlier connected-matter decision. The stated outcome distinguishes the limitation finding from the treatment of penalty. en-us Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:22:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393497 Extended-period limitation was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the respondent. The penalty-related issue was addressed consistently with the merits having been decided in favour of the appellant, while the appeal's principal questions were disposed of by following an earlier connected-matter decision. The stated outcome distinguishes the limitation finding from the treatment of penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393497