https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21712 A referred tax question covered by an earlier binding decision on identical facts was answered consistently with that precedent, so relief under section 80J was allowed to the assessee. On the depreciation issue, the court again followed the prior ruling between the same parties and accepted the higher 15% rate for manufacturing artificial silk. Both questions were thus decided in favour of the assessee and against the Department, with the reference concluded by applying the existing authoritative decision on the same controversy. en-us Fri, 19 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:32:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21712 A referred tax question covered by an earlier binding decision on identical facts was answered consistently with that precedent, so relief under section 80J was allowed to the assessee. On the depreciation issue, the court again followed the prior ruling between the same parties and accepted the higher 15% rate for manufacturing artificial silk. Both questions were thus decided in favour of the assessee and against the Department, with the reference concluded by applying the existing authoritative decision on the same controversy. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 19 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21712