<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 999 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286834</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court modified the death sentence to rigorous imprisonment for life for the appellant convicted of murdering his wife and daughter. Emphasizing the need to balance aggravating and mitigating circumstances, the Court considered the possibility of reformation and rehabilitation, ultimately deciding against the death penalty. The appellant&#039;s sentence was subject to potential remission under the Code of Criminal Procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:27:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 999 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286834</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court modified the death sentence to rigorous imprisonment for life for the appellant convicted of murdering his wife and daughter. Emphasizing the need to balance aggravating and mitigating circumstances, the Court considered the possibility of reformation and rehabilitation, ultimately deciding against the death penalty. The appellant&#039;s sentence was subject to potential remission under the Code of Criminal Procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>