<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (12) TMI 47 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286831</link>
    <description>The court upheld the lower courts&#039; findings, ruling against the appellant on both issues. It was determined that there was no severance of joint status between the plaintiff and his deceased brother, and the Hindu Women&#039;s Right to Property Act, 1937, did not apply retrospectively to the widow. The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:58:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (12) TMI 47 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286831</link>
      <description>The court upheld the lower courts&#039; findings, ruling against the appellant on both issues. It was determined that there was no severance of joint status between the plaintiff and his deceased brother, and the Hindu Women&#039;s Right to Property Act, 1937, did not apply retrospectively to the widow. The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>