https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286829 A plaint alleging a mixed maritime claim could not be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC merely because some items, such as supply of necessaries, may ultimately prove to be non-lien claims. Claims for port dues, pilotage and related charges could, if proved, support a maritime lien, and the exact allocation of payments and the nature of the unpaid items required evidence. The defendant's deposit to secure release of the vessel did not amount to waiver or abandonment of the challenge to arrest, but it was treated as security for the suit claim. The plaint rejection and refund applications were dismissed. en-us Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:12:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286829 A plaint alleging a mixed maritime claim could not be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC merely because some items, such as supply of necessaries, may ultimately prove to be non-lien claims. Claims for port dues, pilotage and related charges could, if proved, support a maritime lien, and the exact allocation of payments and the nature of the unpaid items required evidence. The defendant's deposit to secure release of the vessel did not amount to waiver or abandonment of the challenge to arrest, but it was treated as security for the suit claim. The plaint rejection and refund applications were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286829