https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393491 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax under "commercial or industrial construction" and "construction of complex" services. The issue regarding the demand for service tax under GTA services was remanded to the Principal Commissioner for further examination, allowing the appellant to submit additional documentation. The imposition of interest and penalty was not specifically addressed in the decision. The Tribunal did not explicitly discuss the appellant's argument against the extended period of limitation. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:56:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393491 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax under "commercial or industrial construction" and "construction of complex" services. The issue regarding the demand for service tax under GTA services was remanded to the Principal Commissioner for further examination, allowing the appellant to submit additional documentation. The imposition of interest and penalty was not specifically addressed in the decision. The Tribunal did not explicitly discuss the appellant's argument against the extended period of limitation. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393491