<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 628 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of interest expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(ii). The issues of administrative expense disallowance and Book Profit computation were remitted to the Assessing Officer for further review, emphasizing the requirement for detailed evidence on the investment decision-making process and the correct application of Section 115JB in accordance with legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:22:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 628 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of interest expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(ii). The issues of administrative expense disallowance and Book Profit computation were remitted to the Assessing Officer for further review, emphasizing the requirement for detailed evidence on the investment decision-making process and the correct application of Section 115JB in accordance with legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>